We've heard a lot of rhetoric from the Department for Education about Shanghai. It's easy for us to get frustrated about the comparisons because there are significant differences between our nations, both in terms of culture and the underlying structures of the teaching profession. But let's put the politics to one side - the questions maths teachers should be asking are, "How can I find out what happens in maths lessons in Shanghai, and will those ideas be useful in my classroom?". Well I have some answers for you - you can find out about what works well in Shanghai through the Maths Hub initiative and yes, some of the ideas are fantastic and easy to apply. Don't be too quick to dismiss them.

**Multiplication Strategies**

The two questions above were given to us as a starter at the hub launch. What great questions they are. These are given to 10 year olds in Shanghai and they can work out the answers in their heads. I'm impressed. Well done Shanghai.

It's all about using clever numerical methods. Let's start with something simpler (I'll come back to the starter questions in a minute). This one is done by seven year olds:

Work out

**2.5 x 3.2**in your head. Quickly!

I'm told that students in Shanghai would see this calculation like this:

2.5 x (4 x 0.8) = 10 x 0.8 = 8.

I don't think my students, even my sixth formers, would think like that.

Incidentally, I used a different method. My brain prefers fractions to decimals, so I thought of it like this:

Either way, a bit of clever number manipulation makes this question fairly straightforward.

From a young age, students in Shanghai learn to answer questions like these in their heads:

a. 0.125 x 8

b. 0.5 x 0.2

c. 2.5 x 4

d. 12.5 x 0.8

Through lots of practice, students get really good at working out anything that relates to the 2, 5 and 10 times tables. They also learn to instantaneously recall that 4 x 25 = 100 and 8 x 12.5 = 100. Using these skills, they can answer questions like this in their head:

12.5 x 2.4

Look, there's a 12.5 here. 12.5 is a useful number because it can be multiplied by 8 to get 100. So rewrite the calculation as:

12.5 x (8 x 0.3)

= (12.5 x 8) x 0.3

= 100 x 0.3 = 30

Easy when you know how.

10 year olds in Shanghai might be given this question to look at in a group of three:

125 x 80.8

Together they'll come up with a strategy for answering the question. For example, they might suggest rewriting it as:

125 x 8 x 10.1

= 1000 x 10.1 = 10,100.

See how this works? If we have a 12.5, we look for an 8. If we have a 25, we look for a 4. We manipulate the numbers to make the calculation fit what we know.

So let's use these ideas to answer those starter questions.

2.5 x 4.04 x 0.9

Split the middle number up to get:

2.5 x (4 + 0.04) x 0.9

=((2.5 x 4) + (2.5 x 0.04)) x 0.9

= (10 + 0.1) x 0.9

= 9 + 0.09 = 9.09

I'll leave you to work out a good strategy for answering the second question yourself (tweet me your answer or comment below).

So, why not start teaching your students these clever mental strategies? It's never too late to develop number skills. These lessons would work at any age. I could do with practising these strategies myself.

Here's a few more ideas I've seen on Twitter that might be helpful for developing strategies:

Who can work these out the fastest? Discuss strategies. Shared by @LearningMaths |

Ratio method for division. Shared by @MathsPrimary |

Multiplication strategies. Shared by @MathsPrimary |

Another thing that was mentioned at the hub launch was 'smallest number first'. If a child is asked to work out 7 x 4 then they could think of it as 4 x 7 - so no need to use the 7 times table. Thinking like this cuts down on lots of duplication in memorising times tables. So a large chunk of our usual times tables chart is unnecessary - remove the duplication and we are left with the chart below. Kangaroo Maths also very helpfully gives us the 21 times table facts that students need to learn.

Source: kangaroomaths.com |

**Inequality symbols**

In my post Shortcuts vs Concept Development I admitted that I refer to crocodiles when introducing the inequality symbols (ie crocodiles eat the bigger number).

I decided I'd continue to do this until I found a better way to help students remember which sign is which. Well, today I found a replacement for crocodiles. It's so simple, it's silly.

All students need to do is visualise numbers as blocks - the wider end of the inequality symbol fits over the bigger stack of blocks. So if x > 2, we know x must be a number

*bigger*than 2. Eventually they'll start automatically reading the symbol > as 'greater than' without having to visualise the blocks. Simples.

Chinese pupils use multilinks and straws to learn inequalities. Source: @GlOWmaths |

**Making sense of the order of operations**

Instead of just teaching BODMAS (which in itself is the source of many misconceptions), do you help students to understand why we multiply before we add? This example was given at the launch:

Pencils come in packs of 10. I have 4 full packs and 7 extra pencils. How many pencils do I have?

Children have a variety of strategies:

1. I have 4 packs of 10 pencils plus 7 extra so I do: 4 x 10 + 7 = 47.

2. It's like 5 packs of 10 pencils with three missing so I do: 5 x 10 - 3 = 47

3. I have 7 pencils plus 4 packs of 10, so I do: 7 + 4 x 10 = 47.

In the final example, the child doesn't try to add the 7 and the 4 before multiplying by 10 because it doesn't make sense to do so. The context of the question helps them understand this.

**Worth attending?**

Some people are critical of the Maths Hubs initiative but I felt it was important to attend the launch. I don't want to stubbornly resist learning from Shanghai without at least taking the time to find out about their methods. The ideas I've written about here aren't groundbreaking, but they got me thinking about the way I explain things.

It took me almost two hours (in terrible traffic) to get to the launch event so, as a busy teacher with a young family, I doubt I'll be able to attend any more hub events on school days, which is a shame because they have some great stuff planned. A lot of their work will initially focus on subject knowledge enhancement (ie helping non-specialist teachers with their maths), which is definitely worthwhile. They may not be reaching everyone who needs help

*yet*but there were over 100 people at the launch event, which is a good start.

It's a shame that the hubs' funding might be stopped on the whim of a politician because it makes it hard for them to plan over the long-term. But for now, if they're bringing fresh ideas into classrooms, offering support where it's needed and providing opportunities to collaborate, that's fantastic. Do get in touch with your local hub through www.mathshubs.org.uk to find out what's going on. Just be prepared to hear a lot about Shanghai - but maybe that's not such a bad thing after all.

Thanks for sharing this. To me, good number sense involves the ability to decompose and recompose numbers (and not to blindly follow some algorithm) so you've given me some new ideas that I can share with my colleagues here in Ontario. I like the fact that you pointed out that the presenters did recognize that there are some differences between our systems and Shaghai's that we can't do anything about but that doesn't stop us using their math ideas.

ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment. I'm really glad you think the methods might be helpful. As teachers we need to put the politics to one side and focus on the mathematics. :)

DeleteChock full of great stuff - thank you! The more number work I do in classrooms, the more useful I find this sort of multiplicative 'trickery'. The other day my A-level class asked if I'd planned a particular answer (they didn't believe it was possible to work it out in your head without previously memorizing it!) If only I had time to plan that thoroughly!! I like to use prime factors a lot, too. If you can visualise 24 x 45 in terms of 2s, 3s and 5s you can just rearrange all the factors to make things easy: (12) x 2 x 5 x 3 = (12x3)x10.

ReplyDeletePS - have voted for your blog!

Thanks for voting!

DeleteI didn't learn any clever mental methods at school and I often find that my students do mental maths quicker than me. They do great stuff with number bonds at primary school these days.

I love your prime way of thinking. Breaking numbers down to make them easier to work with is a very clever strategy. My Year 12s take too long to work out 3^4 - they never spot that they could think of it as 3^2 x 3^2, which is so simple.

In case anyone wants a strategy for the 2nd starter question:

ReplyDelete45 x 1.58 + 5.5 x 15.8

= (45 x 1.58) + (55 x 1.58)

= 1.58 (45 + 55)

= 1.58 x 100

= 158

Superb methods shared here Jo :) thanks a bunch for making it so simple and effective. Coming from India I was encouraged and look into different ways of simplifying the Maths. Sure enough, Mental Maths helped me in a long way to get me there. Thanks again for rekindling the interest in me :)

DeleteVijay aka bucharesttutor

Thanks for your comment. I'm glad you like the post. International differences are really interesting. In the UK we don't do much on mental strategies, which is a shame. We're too busy trying to teach far too many topics in our very broad curriculum.

DeleteHave you seen any of the 'how did they do that' you tube countdown videos? they usually rely on taking out 25's ie 100 = 4x25, 75=3x25 etc and working with the smaller numbers up to the final result. I have always worked to the maxim that 'the laziest way is the best way' but some children just hate short cuts - they don't even like rounding £x.99 prices! I must use the @learning maths ones - surely no one will object to the obvious short cuts there!

DeleteThanks for your comment. I haven't seen those videos so will check them out now. I agree, there's a time and place for shortcuts - I don't see the point in overcomplicating things, as long as students understand why the methods work.

DeletePS - I can't find those videos so if you have a link that would be fantastic! Thanks! :)

Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JQYYz92-Uk is one that will lead you to others. if you go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/moreorless/all I think the one from sept 12 is where the guy explains how he did it with the 25's: sorry - don't do podcasts so cant check :(

DeleteThank you! :)

DeleteJust spent ages trying to do this calculation quickly. Omg it's so obvious now you've shown me!

DeleteI think my comment just vanished :o( Two links for you: a discussion of the James Martin 952, a classic in the field: http://www.flyingcoloursmaths.co.uk/secrets-mathematical-ninja-james-martin-952-countdown-puzzle/

ReplyDelete... and my Countdown solver: http://market.flyingcoloursmaths.co.uk/countdown/countdown.php

Thank you! Great stuff. New challenge for me: practise lots of mental maths methods and get really good at Countdown.

DeleteIt brings my memory. I remembered that when I was in school ( Shanghai,China ), my teacher made us remember 25 and 125 times table....

ReplyDelete